In
Taylor v. Amazon.com et al., No. 2:08-cv-00061-wks (D. Vermont filed Mar. 17, 2008), the core of plaintiff's claim is:
Defendants have placed on their website and have offered for sale MP3 files of the thirteen sound recordings Plaintiff created which QuiXote Music pressed and marketed [with authorization from plaintiff, pursuant to a written agreement] ... The page on Defendants' website falsely indicates the copyright in [sound recording and composition] as being "(c) 2008 QuiXote". [However,] the compact discs pressed and marketed [with written authorization] by QuiXote Music beginning in 2001 bear multiple clear indications that the copyright in [the sound recordings and compositions] belong to Plaintiff.Nowhere on the compact discs pressed and marketed by QuiXote Music is there any representation that the copyright in Cheshire Tree Suite belongs to QuiXote Music. On information and belief, QuiXote Music has never represented that it owns the copyright in [the sound recording and compositions]. [Eds: This may explain why QuiXote, the European based manufacturer and distributor of the album, is not a party to this suit.]
Thus, notwithstanding the basic infringement allegation (unauthorized sale of the sound recording via defendants' online digital music store), the central theme of Plaintiff's complaint is a
moral rights theory of
false attribution. In addition to the above quoted material, the theme of a moral rights claim as central to this action is buttressed by plaintiff's allegations of "deliberate misstatement of copyright ownership", and reference to the
Berne Convention as a source of protection.
Nonetheless, Plaintiff's demand for relief is limited to an injunction prohibiting Defendants "from the infringement and unauthorized use of Plaintiff's copyright."
Several Observations and Comments:
(1) Plaintiff does not specify whether the sound recordings and/or compositions are registered. Rather than list (or include as an exhibit) any SR registration number, Plaintiff merely alleges that the works "are protected under the Untied States Code, including without limitation the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act." If unregistered, Plaintiff's claim has a
fatal problem (
17 U.S.C. 411). (Alternatively, her demand for fees and statutory damages may be barred, 17 U.S.C. 412.
Homkow v. Musika Records Inc., No. 04 Civ. 3587, N.Y.L.J. "Decision of the Day", Mar. 17, 2008 (S.D.N.Y. decided Feb. 25, 2008)). Notable, however, is the filing of an
AO Form 121 mailed to the Register of Copyright pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 508. This form, entitled "Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright", presumably was filed with the relevant Registration Numbers, i.e., not left blank? (However, a search of the Copyright Office's public catalogue did not find any relevant SRs.)
(2) What is the process by which digital music stores obtain information regarding copyright ownership?
(3) Where is the European label? Review of Plaintiff's agreement with QuiXote Music would seem highly relevant to whether Plaintiff granted the label authorization to distribute the sound recordings in intangible electronic or digital form, e.g., MP3?
